Petition to Conduct CBI Enquiry into the Murder of Dr J A Mathan

Saturday, 28 December 2013

Public Notice to Dr K V Krishne Gowda: Appear in Karnataka Medical Council

PUBLIC NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE
To, Dr K V Krishne Gowda MBBS., Sub-Registrar, Birth and Death, Ashok Nagar, Bangalore-560 025
You have been issued 3 Notices to your addresses in your place of employment namely:
1. C/O Joint Director Statistics, BBMP Building, First Floor, Near Upparpet Police Station, Upparpet, Bangalore-560 009
2. C/O Sub-Registrar Ashoknagar Birth and Death, Johnson Market, Ashok Nagar, Bangalore-560025
3. S/O Veeregowda, Kadaba Village, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur District, Karnataka

You have not responded to the enquiry related to the MURDER of DR J A Mathan and Aggravated Forgery with the Civil Death Records of Dr J  A Mathan.
You are accused of Crimes as well as Complaint filed against you to cancel your Medical Registration for Violation of Code of Medical Ethics.
Please submit your response to Karnataka Medical Council and be present for the enquiry no. KMC/ENQ/12/13 on 31/01/2014.
Otherwise, decisions may be taken ex-parte against you.

Karnataka Medical Council #70, 2nd Floor, "Vaidyakeeya Bhavana", K.R. Road,H.B. Samaja Road Corner, Basavanagudi, Bangalore- 560004


Monday, 2 September 2013

7 Crores Extortion specialists Police Commissioner Jyothiprakash Mirji drives Ripon Malhotra to suicide

Bangalore top cops acted as 'recovery agents' for minister's son, finds probe
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bangalore-top-cops-acted-as-recovery-agents-for-ministers-son-finds-probe/1141964/


Two top Bangalore police officials accused of acting as recovery agents'' in an alleged suicide note left behind by a businessman, Ripon Kishor Malhotra, 54, two weeks ago were reportedly attempting to recover money invested in one of Malhotra's firms by the son of a veteran Congress politician from Karnataka.

The son of a Congress minister from Davangere had unofficially informed the top police officials about being cheated to the tune of Rs 10 lakh by Malhotra, and the police then attempted to recover the money, said officials of the Central Crime Branch (CCB) of the Bangalore police familiar with the investigation.

Malhotra, accused of cheating small investors who invested in stocks through his brokerage firms of nearly Rs 50 crore, had 23 different firms — including luxury goods company Rodeo Drive — and even travelled as part of former President Prathiba Patil's business delegation to South Korea and Mongolia in July 2011.

He reportedly killed himself at his home in Bangalore on June 29. Three days later, a suicide note surfaced, addressed to Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, accusing Bangalore Police Commissioner Jyothi Prakash Mirji and Central Crime Branch head D Devaraj of acting as "recovery agents'' for his clients and demanding a bribe of Rs 7 crore.

While dozens of businessmen from the Davangere region and their wives are shareholders in some of the ventures run by Malhotra, there is no official record linking the Congress minister's son to the companies, either as a shareholder or investor in stocks through Malhotra's Rippsons Shares Pvt Ltd and Rippsons Equity Solutions Pvt Ltd companies.

CCB sources, however, said it was a call from the minister's son that mobilised the Bangalore commissioner's office and the CCB to pursue Malhotra in the days before his death. On June 26, Malhotra was questioned by CCB officials at the CCB office. Two of his company's officials were questioned and brought before the police commissioner on June 28.
Officially, the police claimed to have cracked down on Malhotra on the basis of a complaint filed against him in the Whitefield police station in Bangalore in February this year by a businessman, Anil Reddy, who alleged that he had been cheated of Rs 25 lakh. The case was transferred to the CCB in April this year.

In his alleged suicide note, Malhotra has not named the client at whose behest the police pursued him. "Your commissioner is acting like a sub-inspector or constable to recover six lakhs...Your commissioner, whose duty it is to keep law and order, is acting as commission or recovery agent with his team of DCP and inspectors,'' he said.

Siddaramaiah has ordered an inquiry by the Criminal Investigation Department of the state police. The suicide note has been sent for forensic analysis in order to establish its veracity.

Both Mirji and Devaraj have been shunted out. Mirji has claimed that he did not know Malhotra and had never spoken to him. Devaraj has said the police followed due process in the investigations against Malhotra.

"We have given the investigation to senior police officer P K Garg. A deadline of one month has been set for the investigation,'' said DGP, CID, Bipin Gopalkrishna.

The Malhotra case has kicked up a controversy, as there are standing orders within the Karnataka police department and directives from the Karnataka High Court that the police must not engage in settlement of disputes of civil nature but should follow a legal process of recovery through the courts.

Since taking over, the new Bangalore police commissioner, Raghavendra Auradkar, has assured that the police will not engage in civil dispute settlements or such recovery of dues.

A section of the police, however, feels that the focus in the case has been skewed on account of the alleged suicide note. "The perpetrator of the offence here was Malhotra. The victims are people like the minister's son and others who invested with him,'' said a top police official.

Friday, 19 April 2013

Rights panel finds boy illegally detained in police station: DCP ravikanthe gowga

Rights panel finds boy illegally detained in police station: DCP Ravikanthe Gowda
http://sichrem.wordpress.com/category/police-brutality/
December 21, 2011
He has been held for the second time, says police officer

A 16-year-old boy was found by the Karnataka State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (KSCPCR) illegally detained, handcuffed and chained to a window at the Sampigehalli police station on Tuesday.

According to a press release, the commission received information that the minor had been detained at the police station since December 17. When a team reached the police station, they found the boy seated on a blanket and handcuffed with a leading chain attached to the bars of a window.

In the release, chairperson of the commission Nina Nayak said that the boy appeared to be in pain and showed several fresh bruises on his torso, arms and legs. He said that he was given little food and was chained since Saturday evening. He claimed that he was picked up by the police on December 17 at around 9.30 p.m. near his home at Sadiq Layout, Thaneersandra, when he was going to a pharmacy to purchase medicines. The boy alleged that he was beaten by several police men at the station.

The release stated that the boy’s parents received a call that he was at the police station. When they went there, they were not allowed to meet him. The boy’s father Dastagi, a welder, reportedly produced documents showing that his son was 16.

Mr. Dastagi claimed that his son was an eighth standard school drop-out. He told the commission that the police gave him no reason for picking up his son. The policemen all alleged that the boy had stolen money and three mobile phones.

The commission contacted Deputy Commissioner of Police (North East) B.R. Ravikanthe Gowda, who deputed Assistant Commissioner of Police M.N. Chandrappa to look into the matter. When questioned by Mr. Chandrappa and Ms. Nayak, Sampigehalli inspector K. Nanjunde Gowda refuted the claims made by the boy. He claimed that the boy was picked up on Tuesday. However, no complaint against the boy had been received at the station, the release said.

The commission was informed that no diary entry had been made or FIR filed. The inspector also stated that there was another case pending in the neighbouring police station and the boy was picked up for inquiry.

Both the Assistant Commissioner of Police and the inspector assured the commission that the boy would be presented before a member of the Juvenile Justice Board. The commission has directed the inspector to submit records pertaining to the apprehension of the minor by 3 p.m. on Wednesday. A complaint has been lodged at the Karnataka State Human Rights Commission by SICHREM.

Meanwhile, Mr. Ravikanthe Gowda told The Hindu that the boy has been arrested for the second time. He said that the minor was a habitual offender and that he was involved in four theft cases. After the arrest, the stolen goods were recovered from him, he added.

Monday, 15 April 2013

Media, police should be more sensitive toward Dalits, Muslims: Siddiqui. Falsely accused Media Journalist by ACP Nyame Gowda



Media, police should be more sensitive toward Dalits, Muslims: Siddiqui
February 27, 2013
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/media-police-should-be-more-sensitive-toward-dalits-muslims-siddiqui/article4456305.ece
“If I was the mastermind, then why are the others still in jail?”

A day after his release from jail, 26-year-old journalist Muthi-ur-Rahman Siddiqui has accused the police of harbouring an “institutional bias” against the Muslim community. “If I wasn’t Muslim, they would never have held me [on charges of being part of a terror module],” he said at a packed press conference here on Tuesday.
Falsely Accused by Police ACP Halasur Gate Nyame Gowda
Barely able to conceal his resentment toward law enforcement agencies and sections of the media that branded him as the “mastermind” of a terror module, Mr. Siddiqui said: “The media and the police need to be more sensitive toward the downtrodden, Dalits and Muslims. The way the media and the police behaved raises basic questions about their attitude toward Muslims. Muslims are often cast by them in stereotypes. There is an institutional bias which manifests in such cases. This is not just about me; it is about hundreds like me who are in jails [across the country] on terror charges. Muslims are not terrorists.”

He said, “The media forgot the ‘A’ in the ABC of Journalism [Accuracy-Brevity-Clarity].”

Mr. Siddiqui was arrested by the Crime Branch of the Bangalore Police, along with 14 others, in August 2012 on charges of plotting to assassinate prominent Hindutva leaders as well as some journalists. The National Investigation Agency, which later took over the case, found no evidence against either Mr. Siddiqui or Yusuf Nalband in their charge sheet.

Pleading the case of the other 13 still in jail, Mr. Siddiqui said, “According to the [Bangalore] police and the media, I am the mastermind. If I am the mastermind, why are the others still in jail? I hope they too will get justice.” He said journalism was his passion and he wanted to continue. Asked if he would sue the police, he said, “I haven’t thought about that. I want to spend time with my family first.”

He also alleged that the police did not follow protocol during his arrest. “They did not inform our families. They did not tell us what we were being arrested for. They made us sign 30-40 blank sheets of paper. One of these papers was used to create fake, back-dated arrest intimation.”

Mr. Nalband (28), the technician who was released along with Mr. Siddiqui, was reticent during the press conference. He later told The Hindu, “I could not sleep the whole of last [Monday] night. I had all kinds of thoughts. I am not sure if life will be normal again. I am hoping I can get back to my life, God willing.”

He also alleged that the Hyderabad police, who assisted the Bangalore police during the arrests, forced the accused to wear Islamic skull caps before taking them out of the house where they were arrested. “I don’t know why they did that,” he said.
>>
http://tehelka.com/bangalore-terror-plot-nia-files-chargesheet-but-charges-mostly-non-prosecutable/

On August 29 2012, five youths were picked up from their homes in a Muslim locality in Bangalore by the Central Crime Branch of the Karnataka police in connection with a terror plot. Once the news went out that among those arrested were Muthi-ur-Rahman Siddique, a journalist from Deccan Herald and a DRDO scientist, Aijaz Ahmed Mirza, and they had alleged plans to kill prominent right leaning persons, it sent shock waves across the state. Now, six months down the line, NIA has filed a chargesheet in the case, not before dropping charges against two of the twelve accused, including journalist Muthi-ur-Rahman Siddique. And as the things stand, the defense counsel of the accused claims that the charges levelled by NIA are mostly not prosecutable in nature.

A total of 25 people have been accused in the case, out of them close to 10 are absconding and have gone abroad, two have been dropped from the chargesheet, and for another two, including the DRDO scientist, the chargesheet is yet to be filed. The NIA, which took over the investigation from the Bangalore police on 25 November 2012, has filed a 65-page chargesheet in which they accuse them of being activists of Lashkar-e-Toiba and HuJI, who had plans to kill journalist Pratap Simha, Vishweshwar Bhat, editor of Kannada Prabha, Karnataka MP Prahlad Joshi and Ganu Jartarkar, an activist of the Hindu Jagran Vedike. Unlike the FIR, the chargesheet also accuses them of having made plans to even target police officers Dayanand (Joint Commissioner-East), Krishnam Raju and ACP Nyame Gowda. Incidentally, Dayanand was the head of investigations in the case before the NIA took over.

The chargesheet rests its case mainly on cyber forensic evidence (mostly email exchanges between the accused), 181 witnesses and confessional statements of the accused. Though, the chargesheet claims that the police had seized two Italian Beretta pistols from the accused from the crime scene, they however, have not been able to establish, from whom the accused purchased the weapon from. In the chargesheet it just mentions that, an ‘unknown person’ gave the weapon. Neither were the police able to explore and trace the entire network of how the alleged terrorists, who happen to be students in the age group of 20s, were able to get such sophisticated weapons. The chargesheet further claims, during the subsequent interrogation of the accused, that they were able to seize weapons from the accused’s house; however, the weapons listed are mostly ‘air pistols’, which the police claim was initially used for target practicing.

While the chargesheet claims that a huge cache of cyber forensic evidence has been procured by the police, including email exchanges and material procured from the hard disk, the evidence produced consists mostly of materials which is commonly available on the internet including, ‘videos of the American occupation in Afghanistan’, books on Islam and religion in general, articles – ‘who are Taliban’, and a general history of ‘French revolution and Great Wall of China’. The chargesheet however, shows a ‘Microsoft word document’, which it claims it intercepted from one of the email exchanges, which has a list of people to be targeted along with their pictures. In the evidence, the chargesheet claims that the actual planning was a coded message wherein the accused had laid out their nefarious plan. Defense Lawyer Sultan Beary says that the coded messages were how the police were reading into it. “They were attending a marriage and most of the conversations are of that,” he said.

The chargesheet also names close to ten people as absconding and residing in the Gulf States. However it is silent on why even after six months, they haven’t been able to extradite any of the accused, including the alleged ‘mastermind’ Zakir alias Ustad (Shaheed Faisal). Neither has the police mentioned whether they made any effort for extradition, and what were its results.

Since the NIA has taken over the case, the charge of ‘waging war against the state’ has also been dropped and they are currently been charged for criminal conspiracy, creating enmity between people and for dacoity.

Whether the police will finally be able to prove their case or if the alleged accused did in fact indulge in anti-national activities, it will take time for the courts to decide. However, it is feared that, by the time a decision will be reached in their case, a couple of years of their life will be lost in prison.

Siddaramaih charges Encounter specialist DCP Ravikanthe Gowda and Police with Hooliganism


Siddaramaih charges DCP Ravikanthe and Police with Hooliganism
http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/1763263/report-congress-leaders-sink-differences
Nov 11, 2012
Parameshwar, Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar show rare unity at a protest rally.
DCP Central B R Ravikanthe Gowda
Congress party workers were on Saturday thrilled to see a rare show of unity among their leaders, while staging a protest against the ruling BJP’s zero governance.

KPCC president G Parameshwar, leader of the opposition Siddaramaiah and prominent leader DK Shivakumar, who always avoided each other or remained confined to their own groups, displayed solidarity while leading a protest.

Chief minister Jagadish Shettar was heading a dead government, said Siddaramaiah to thunderous applause. Parameshwar added that the BJP does not deserve to rule because the saffron party does not have the ability to govern.

Thousands of Congress protesters, who had gathered at the Freedom Park, jumped with joy when Shivakumar joined the two leaders and attacked the BJP government.

Enthused by the momentum, the three leaders led the Congress workers to lay siege on Shettar’s residence near Golf Course. The procession was stopped near Anand Rao Circle by the police, with great difficulty.

Siddaramaiah charged the police with hooliganism and a verbal duel broke out between him and DCP (North) Ravikanthe Gowda.

The DCP’s attempts to persuade Siddaramaiah were unsuccessful. Siddaramaiah charged that he was a government agent and even tried to climb the barricade, but was pulled down by the police.

An upset Siddaramaiah then staged a protest by sitting on the road. He raised slogans against police high handedness and was later  packed off to a police vehicle.

Then Parameshwar goaded the Congress workers to carry on the protest. He resisted police attempts to take him to custody. He was literally dragged to the police vehicle. The Congress leaders were released later in the day.

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

Vijay Clinic of "Dr" Sunder Raj Opposite Railway Station, Gulbarga


"Dr" Sunder Raj Opposite Railway Station, Gulbarga

Dr Sunder Raj claims to have the Qualification of M.D. AM which is the Fake Degree conferred by Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine by Correspondence.

Dr Sunder Raj has no other Genuine Medical Qualifications.

M.D. Alternative Medicine
Dr Sunder Raj and Dr Anil Kumar practicing in Gulbarga Near Old Jewargi Road and Tarfail Road photographed on 02/10/2012
UGC warns against 21 fake universities
http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_ugc-warns-against-21-fake-universities_1747264
Monday, Oct 1, 2012
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has unveiledthe list of 21 fake universities from nine states across the nation. While Maharashtra has only one university ‑ Raja Arabic University, Nagpur ‑ in the list, Uttar Pradesh tops with eight universities followed by Delhi with six universities.

UGC declares the list of fake universities for public information from time to time. The aim is to alert candidates seeking admission in such universities.


Other states from where fake universities have been listed are Bihar, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.

The detailed list is available on http://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/8707088_English.pdf

“Students and the public at large are hereby informed that the UGC has identified, so far, these 21 self-styled, unrecognised institutions in nine states, which are functioning in contravention of the provisions of the UGC Act. All these institutions have been declared as fake and do not have any right to confer or grant degrees. It is for general information that aspiring students are advised /cautioned not to pursue higher education courses with these institutions. Anyone dealing with such institutions for pursuing academic studies for degrees, shall be doing so at his/her own risk and responsibility,” states the notice.

It further adds, “Students, their parents and the general public are, therefore, advised to refer to the websites of UGC (www.ugc.ac.in), the AICTE (www.aicte.ernet.in) and DEC (www.dec.ac.in) to verify and satisfy themselves of the list of the recognized Indian Universities/Institutions before joining or taking admission in various courses.

http://www.ugc.ac.in/page/Fake-Universities.aspx

State-wise List of fake Universities as in September, 2012   (Hindi Version) 

offering M.D Alternative Medicine by Correspondence Course

West Bengal

Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine, Kolkatta.


Friday, 14 September 2012

T R Shantha Raj


T R Shantha Raj
Shantha Raj
"Dr" Sham Sunder...opposite Nalwar Railway Station, Gulbarga
"Dr" Sudheer Kumar, Opposite Railway Station, Nalwar